May 2006 Archives

Liberation for Women - what liberation?

Today as much as 50% of all women population in all developing nations, go for work...this is unlike the case two decades back when only in the developed countries(mostly the west) women could be found in offices.

Is today's woman liberated from all the social nutshells of life she was locked into in the name of culture ... or, so it looks like.

The truth is against the closure of the case for woman liberation. You dont have to go any further than Advertisements, to study a country's or city's view of its woman population. The way an Ad is conceptualized goes without saying that it is representative of the majority population in the audience.

Study Ads in India and you will find depiction of women as the gender of the species which takes care of the cooking, shopping, children rearing, teaching, and all activites which can be called family welfare or society welfare. ... and obviously it shows all men folks as the ones crumbling under stress and pressure at office, home, and everywhere. Women are also depicted beauty conscious, health conscious, and generally consciousness itself is only related to women in Ads, probably Ad people seem to understand that men folk like me are considerably unconscious decision makers.

But women are never shown as representative of strength as much as care-takers of their child's nutrition, and, almost always they seem to represent a household work stressed person, be it promoting the muscle pain relief balm 'Moov', or, promoting a new toilet cleaner.

Take Ads in the America's, women depict beauty products, promote watches like 'OMEGA', sell quick-pro AbSlimmer kits, pose for almost all corporate ads like clean smart employees, and all that they represent much more than what men represent. And I really don't know, but I have always seen men only in Ads for innovative homecare products like the all-in-one do-it-yourself plumbing kit, do dishwashing with machines like a snap, and most often with a 3-layered non-stick oven-cum-frying pan-cum-cooker-cum..everything.

Does this mean, majority of Women in India do all the household even if they go to work, and majority of men in America share household tasks of their partners if not do it all themselves.

Yes, tell me if someone really thinks it doesn't mean so.. after looking at facts.

More so, in places like my country India, where we claim to respect women more than anywhere else in the world, ... women are still considered just people who were born to get married to a man, and take care of him. And most often women going to work actually go only to take care of the family expenses, finance those home loans, pay credit card bills including husband's cards, and save for that once in a year travel plans.

Many people have this question:
Do Ads reflect people, or people try to believe and reflect the Ads.
The answer truly is both ways in mutual understanding... but in my opinion more Ads reflect people than people reflecting the Ads.

I have seen some sense with Ad people and generally all media peole trying to leave out an old formulation of depicting a society when they see that the days are gone. Thanks to people like sania mirza, an indian tennis star, indians now relate women more with sports than they did before sania arrived.

Things are changing.. but in India the idea that women are born to be married haunts behind every woman's career, and may be it will do so even with sania when her time comes.

The society that a woman has to everyday live with, the family and relatives around, don't waste anytime making it clear to a girl who just complete college, that she is expectex to throw off everything she has to get married and may be optionally try getting back to career, after 2-3 years of marriage, and kids. There are exceptions, there are exceptions, but very few... really, very few.

So, for the question of liberation for women, in India-lik countries, I think we should not expect to see it happen anywhere in the visible future... and was anybody asking about muslim nations... do you need to even think about it happening with muslim communities, where, by religious beliefs they don't allow women even into their mosques for praying.

Asking for women liberation, all around the world, is as equivalent to asking for world peace, and has the same value of probablity of it happening,
as much as world peace happening when all countries reportedly have their largest GDP allocation for defence.


The Arcelor ball game

Are you following the Arcelor steel hostile bid by Mittal Steel and recent drama by the board of both the companies confusing investors to the maximum.

Game history:
Arcelor Steel and Mittal steel which are considered first two of world's very large steel companies, are in a tussle. In a hostile attempt Mittal steel(world's largest) has been trying to acquire Arcelor steel(world's second largest and major competitor to Mittal), to become the monopolistic large steel company in the world.

Arcelor being a large company itself, obviously not willing to be acquired that too by chief competitor Mittal, called for various methods to counteract the hostile attempt of acquisition by Mittal.

(For newbies to public share based company manipulations: If a major part of shares of a company is acquired by a person or another company, the other company is said to be acquired since the buyer being the major stock holder gets the largest voice in the company's business and operations. So, someone needn't actually request a company to accept acquisition.. its often forced acquisition like this with almost all big companies, Database Software giant Oracle acquiring CRM & Management software giant peoplesoft (which was leader in the domain) to give a big entry for Oracle in the sector, is another forced acquisition example which happened last year)

Arcelor in this situation had sought even legal sanctions from its country's government to block the acquisition attempt by Mittal, and a lot of activity has been happening since then. On the Mittal side, Mr. Lakshmi Mittal considered one of the most wealthiest in Britain is doing everything legally and informally possible to make the acquisition flow through, since it will allow Mittal to dominate the market and today steel is hot cake next only to Oil.

Lately...
Lately there was a protest by Arcelor employees against the acquisition which failed to gain momentum but made Mittal increase the bid amount by almost 30% of an earlier bid.. Lastly Mittal's asking was "25. point nuts billion Euros". Arcelor ignored this offer too and was busy working ways to stop Mittal.

Counteraction later, led to Mittal going to the stock market and announcing an open offer to buy all Arcelor stocks traded, for a premium, if investors wanted to sell it to Mittal. The offer is currently open.

Arcelor's turn again.. and ball is being given another shot.. Arcelor yesterday announced a tie-up with a russian steel maker 'Severstal', and the chairman of Severstal Alexei Mordashov will sell his majority stake in the company.. which will make Arcelor the major stake holder of the Russian firm, and in return Mordashov will get 32% of the merged Arcelor-Severstal steel Co. ..which takes Mardashov directly to the big board of Arcelor.

This new tie-up will need Arcelor's public stake holders approval, as like any company level decision.. and the approval will be sought by June 28th.

There are two things now.. If Arcelors investors approve of the tieup the new company cannot be acquired by Mittal probably because it will be bigger and have more share holders to woe. But if before july Mittal makes more than or close to 50% of shares of Arcelor in its open offer making Mittal major stake holder of Arcelor, then Mittal will obviously cancel the tieup with the russian giant and remain the major share holder.

So, the ball is now rolling.. July will decide where Arcelor settles.

arcelor_1.jpgMittal_1.jpg

There are many reasons why Arcelor would not like to be acquired by Mittal.
* Arcelor is already a giant in steel, and is a core competitor to Mittal, just that it has less money than Mittal shouldn't become its weakness and give into Mittal's bid. It affects mindset of Arcelor employees and directors who are currently working with "their" company Arcelor. (If Mittal takes over, it could be more Mittal's company)

* Mittal groups corporate governance, they say has more of his family, bringing more family interests, and that, Arcelor says, is not convincing that Mittal will be able to carry the new merged business better than what Arcelor is now.

* Mittal is an indian settled in Britain.. and this may disturb or atleast raise some eyebrows if he becomes more heavier in an industry dominated by Europeans since industrial revolution.

Small investor interests anybody ?
This is like the arranged marriage system in India.. where parents arrange for two people to get married based on everything else except the bride and the groom who stand strangers till almost 2-3 months after marriage.

What I mean is... Whatever said, Investors are plain simply considered traders on the stock market by all public companies and not actually people who the company. There are rules that things need be transparent with the investors, much more stricter rules like the recent SOX compliance, but its still left to the board of the companies to decide what information goes out..

The interests of the carefully appointed board of the company are the core of the business, and share holders are only for annual body meetings and approval votes. Even if the general public share holders vote against a company decision, its highly probably and most often still approved since the major stake holders who are on the board, approve it. And what not, major stake holders are not people who buy here..there and gain a major share, they are always business contacts of the other major stake holders of the company.

The background processing
In my opinion, its hightly unlikely that Mittal wins... because there are always political interests in large companies and there will background dealing which will decide what happens. And for that, Mittal could already be working in the background to attract medium -majority stake holders to his offer.

Processing.. please wait.
Lets wait to see how this game turns...Mittal or Arcelor.

Related...
Arcelor Severstal deal - Hindu on net
buzzle.com The takeover bid story so far
European protectionism.. says Felix online


Bomb inside a potato

While somebody found an artillery tip out of a potato, another person found a full live hand-grenade inside a potato. These were discovered by staff of McCains in their british factory which makes frozen french fries out of potatoes.

They move potatoes from their harvest areas to manufacturing plants where they are cleaned and processed. During the manual cleaning /checking processes they have occassionally spotted bombs, artilleries and some weapon pieces it seems. The potatoes are from the area which was once a World War II zone, and the potatoes seem to grow covering and containing the memorabilia interestingly.

The news items further says:

The Scarborough plant, located in northern England, was opened in 1969 and uses 1,400 tons of potatoes every week. Production is back to normal.

McCain’s Whittlesey plant near Peterborough in eastern England has also been evacuated several times this year after WWII ordnance was found in batches of potatoes.

“Occasionally during the use of imported potatoes from Belgium and northern France, ordnance debris from the First and Second World War is found,” McCain said in a statement.

If you are in britain, the next time you buy potatoes, or buy french fries from Mc.Cains make sure to check it with metal detectors before biting on the bomb. :o)

When i read it first, i remembered the names 'potato bomb', 'onion bomb', .. that we give to particular kind of fire crackers here in chennai. But none of these bombs here produce a potato mash, or onion pungent smell... which would probably be the case if the potato bombs in britain were blown up.

But anyways, it would have been interesting to see such a potato which grew up with a bomb. :o) Bold fellow.

Read the full news here...msnbc.com


Who are Money mongers? Are there any in India?

'Oil' is natural wealth.. one such like gold.. one such like silicon, .. one such like silver.

As you see them. they are all the costly commodities. People who trade in these items, especially oil have unanimous understanding of always increasing their prices.

A short analysis:

I live in chennai, india.. (Remember india is considered a poor country)
My friend lives in USA.. (USA is the worlds largest economy .. and a much developed country compared to india)

Chennai, india .. petrol today costs 47 rupees / litre. (its petrol here.. and measured in litres)

In USA, gasoline today costs approx 3$ / gallon (its gasoline here.. and measured in gallons)

1 gallon is approx. 2.8 litres.
1 USD is approx. 45 rupees.
Calculating we find that equivalent cost for fuel / litre in USA is 37 rupees

One more reason to ditch you patriotic feelings and go live in USA.. (because india is not going to grow.. and these politicians the 1000's of them will never allow that thing to happen even remotely)

Whose OIL are they selling :

Companies:
Oil comes from the ground under... nobody actually owns it, cultivates it, or protect or replenish it.
Its a natural resource. People just dig extract, refine and sell the oil. and for this the oil companies charge as if they cultivated the oil on their own.

Stock traders:
Anything that sells hot, and has huge potential to bring revenue by trading stocks, becomes stocks at the end of the day. Oil, gold, silver, .. y even pepper is traded in markets for huge sums of money much much more than the actual cost of manufacture or production.

Why? because people want to make money. Stock traders trade oil for huge money because it gives them more profit. These traders aka 'money mongers' dont care that raising the oil prices affects a lot of things.

Governments:
Especially we are talking about indian government here. Indian government is over staffed especially with politicians and high level managers (thanks to coalition politics). There are too many politicians today than there were in Jawaharlal Nehru's period. Reason is now politics is huge business. And its easy business.

Beg, beat, cheat ..do something and win elections.. : Raise the taxes on all highly consumed commodities like oil : Share the lockers of tax money that the government collects in the process .. within fellow politicians.

In India average tax on oil or petrol is more than 150% of the cost of oil...

Seems like that wasn't enough for the politicians in India today.. ... News: "Oil ministry in india is discussing increase in oil prices"... with whom ? Not with consumers.. (who cares!).. they are discussing with fellow politicians.. asking whether this much money is enough for everybody there.

India.. will be developing country. .for another 40 yrs.. why 40 years? Because that's when we can expect today's politicians to die.. they wont let this country grow out economically until they die for sure. That explains why the average age of indian politicians is above 60.


India announces plans to build robot army

what is foo bar??

foobar.gifIf you are a geek .. the kind of person watching computer monitors more than the time you watch anything else in a day.. then you would have come across technical books on computers very often using the naming foo and bar in their examples.

Except the first few times, you wouldn't have had time to bother why always everyone had examples named that way... the other common practise is to output 'Hello world' in programs, but that is ok.

Foo and bar are the disgusting words which never meant anything that you already knew, probably.

I recently jumped on a question in a technical forum where a 'newbie' as they call a new programmer, had this question as to what is foo and bar... and whether they were names of technologies, or commands sent to the computer to allow running the program or something ?? :o)

Some programmers themself have had done some research to find out where it all started, and why the early programming authors took to using names like foo and bar in their examples.

The end result of such research is as below. you could also find this at wikipedia.

Many people believe its an evolution of the US military slang 'FUBAR'...
[ click above wikipedia link to know more about the military slang...you will find some interesting definition that explains little frustration.. which I am not comfortable adding to my blog as it is :o) ]

May be somebody started the practise by using that military slang.. or, may be someone liked a candy called 'foo bar',

or whatever,

but at the bottom of it, the examples use foobar in the names to drive a fact that the author of the book or program wants to convey, and the fact is that foobar is just a name and you could use anything in its place without any particular meaning or impact.

Hey .. did u notice, while typing this post, i think i made an exciting name for a candy.. "foo bar candy" sounds good :o) .. we should stop foobar in our programs, and start thinking choclate bars for the name i think.


About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from May 2006 listed from newest to oldest.

April 2006 is the previous archive.

June 2006 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Pages

Powered by Movable Type 5.02